TRANSFORMATION OF THE MAINSTREAM METHODOLOGY IN THE INFORMATION ECONOMY OF XXI CENTURY

Keywords: mainstream, rationality, bounded rationality, predictable irrationality, information economy

Abstract

The article investigates methodological failures of mainstream economics to explain the current economic life in the era of information dominance that is marked by widespread effects of information asymmetry and infoglut, which undercut the rationality concept. Its purpose is to determine the ways of transformation of the mainstream methodology under such changes of the economy in the XXI century. Approaching this goal the author traces the evolution of mainstream economics under increasing risk, uncertainty and irrationality. Their crucial rise is inspired by different kinds of informational manipulations. Among them are manipulation with a quality of a good, expected competitive strategies of rivals, expected return on capital, regulatory changes, etc. One of them – manipulation with a quality of a good – is modelled in the article to show its ability to provide the multiplicity of market equilibriums that undercuts the efficiency of fundamental equilibrium models of mainstream economics. The article argues the way to cope with this problem, suggesting complementation of the concept of bounded rationality with the concept of predictable irrationality. There is a scope of research witch argues that irrationality of economic actors has a low entropy, complying with separation effect, bandwagon effect, etc. The others argue split effect on market boundaries. Both approaches, keeping the predictable irrationality, taper the window of market equilibriums and create the strong basis of equilibrium models’ coming back to the core of economic theory. However, the restoration is done at the new methodological basis that asks for change of economic analysis tools: substitution of strict econometric models with dynamic conceptual ones, shift from research of the exact algorithms to research of fundamental principles of economic choice, complementation of traditional economic analysis instruments with the psychological ones. Keeping such basic milestones at the first steps of analysis helps to approach to narrower multiplicity of the options of economic choice, within which the mainstream models steel work.

References

Нижник М. Моделювання обмеженої раціональності у прийнятті рішень. Науковий вісник Національного лісотехнічного університету України. 2006. Вип. 16.8. С. 133–144.

Светлова Е. Элст Х. Феномен неполного знания будущего в экономической теории. Вопросы экономики. 2013. № 8. С. 83–105.

Тутов Л.А., Шаститко А.Е. Ограниченная рациональность: проблемы системности определения в междисциплинарном контексте. Общественные науки и современность. 2005. № 2. С. 117–127.

Артур Б. Индуктивное мышление и ограниченная рациональность. Экономический вестник РГГУ. 2003. Том 1. № 3. С.53–61.

Ватаманюк О.З. Раціональність поведінки людини в економічній науці: класичний та неокласичний підходи. Економічна теорія та право. 2018. № 2 (33). С.11–25.

Стиглиц Дж. Информация и смена парадигмы в экономической науке. Нобелевская лекция. Мировая экономическая мысль. Сквозь призму веков : в 5-х т. ; сопред. редкол. Г. Г. Фетисов, А. Г. Худокормов. Москва, 2005. С. 535–629.

Стиглер Дж. Экономическая теория информации. Вехи экономической мысли: в 6 т. ; Санкт-Петербург : Экономическая школа. Т.2 Теория фирмы. / сост. В.М. Гальперин. 1999. С. 507–529.

Уильямсон О.И. Экономические институты капитализма. Санкт-Петербург : Лениздат; SEV Press. 1996. 702 с.

Герасименко А. Г. Ринкова влада: джерела, масштаби, наслідки : монографія. Київ : Київ. нац. торг.-екон. ун-т, 2014. С. 600.

Ариели Д. Предсказуемая иррациональность. Скрытые силы, определяющие наши решения. Москва. 2010. 296 с.

Чалдини Р. Психология влияния. Как научиться убеждать и добиваться успеха. Москва : Эксмо, 2010. 416 с.

Глухарева Л.И. Тимина Е.И. Иррациональность рационального человека. Вестник РГГУ Серия «Экономика. Управление. Право». 2014. № 15 (137). С. 18–27.

Герасименко А.Г., Свистільник В.Ю. Теоретико-методологічний аналіз змісту інформаційної економіки. Економічний вісник Національного гірничого університету. 2017. № 1 (57). С. 19–27.

Клейнер Г. Микроэкономика знаний и мифы современной теории. Высшее образование в России. 2006. №9. С.32–37.

Nyzhnyk M. (2006) Modeliuvannia obmezhenoi ratsionalnosti u pryiniatti rishen [Modelling of bounded rationality for decision-making] Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoho lisotekhnichnoho universytetu Ukrainy. no. 16.8. pp. 133–144.

Svetlova E. Elst Kh. (2013) Fenomen nepolnogo znaniya budushhego v ekonomicheskoj teorii [Phenomenon of incomplete knowledge about future in economic theory]. Voprosy ekonomiki. no. 8. pp. 83–105.

Tutov L.A., Shastitko A.E. (2005) Ogranichennaya raczionalnost: problemy sistemnosti opredeleniya v mezhdiscziplinarnom kontekste [Bounded rationality: problems of consistent determination under interdisciplinary]. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost. no. 2. pp. 117–127.

Arthur B. (2003) Induktivnoe myshlenie i ogranichennaya raczionalnost. [Inductive thinking and bounded rationality] Ekonomicheskij vestnik RGGU. vol.1. no. 3. pp. 53–61.

Vatamaniuk O.Z. (2018) Ratsionalnist povedinky liudyny v ekonomichnii nautsi: klasychnyi ta neoklasychnyi pidkhody [Rationality of individual conduct in economic science: classical and neoclassical approaches]. Ekonomichna teoriia ta pravo. no.2 (33). pp.11–25.

Stiglitz J. (2005) Informacziya i smena paradigmy v ekonomicheskoj nauke [Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics]. Nobelevskaya lekcziya. Mirovaya ekonomicheskaya mysl. Skvoz prizmu vekov [World economic thoughts. In the retrospect of time]. Moscow. pp. 535–629.

Stigler J. (1999) Ekonomicheskaya teoriya informaczii [Economic theory of information]. Vekhi ekonomicheskoj mysli [The milestones of economic thoughts] T.2 Teoriya firmy [Theory of firm ]. Sankt-Petersburg: Ekonomicheskaya shkola. pp.507–529.

Williamson O.E. (1996) Ekonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma [The Economic Institutions of Capitalism]. Sankt-Petersburg : Lenizdat; SEV Press.

Gerasymenko A.G. (2014) Rynkova vlada: dzherela, masshtaby, naslidky: monohrafiia. [Market power ; sources, scope and consequences: monograph] Kyiv : Kyiv. nats. torh.-ekon. un-t.

Ariely D. (2010) Predskazuemaya irraczionalnost. Skrytye sily, opredelyayushhie nashi resheniya. [Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions] Moscow.

Cialdini R. (2010) Psikhologiya vliyaniya. Kak nauchitsya ubezhdat i dobivatsya uspekha [Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion]. Moscow: Eksmo.

Glukhareva L.I., Timina E.I. (2014) Irraczionalnost raczionalnogo cheloveka. [Irrationality of rational individual] Vestnik RGGU. Seriya «Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo». no.15 (137). pp. 18–27.

Gerasymenko A. G., Svystilnyk V. Yu. (2017) Teoretyko-metodolohichnyi analiz zmistu informatsiinoi ekonomiky [Theoretical and methodological analysis of information economy]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Natsionalnoho hirnychoho universytetu. no. 1 (57). pp. 19–27.

Klejner G. (2006) Mikroekonomika znanij i mify sovremennoj teorii [Microeconomics of knowledge and the mythes of modern theory]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. no.9. pp. 32–37.

Article views: 543
PDF Downloads: 431
Published
2020-11-09
How to Cite
Gerasymenko, A. (2020). TRANSFORMATION OF THE MAINSTREAM METHODOLOGY IN THE INFORMATION ECONOMY OF XXI CENTURY. Taurida Scientific Herald. Series: Economics, (3), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.32851/2708-0366/2020.3.1
Section
ECONOMIC THEORY AND HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT